Internal founders’ memo · candid by design· unlisted & noindexed

A venture proposal · June 2026

On Brand Games — the founders’ memo

Custom daily puzzle & card games, skinned to a client’s brand — plus the part nobody else sells: a managed content desk that rotates every game daily, in lockstep with their marketing calendar. They curate a spreadsheet; their audience comes back every day.

From Michael · for Terry & Walter · onbrandgames.com

What we’d sell

A format library and a desk.

The games are the hook. The desk is the business — recurring, high-touch, priced like an agency retainer, not a SaaS seat. And the library isn’t capped at three: we match formats to each client’s demographics and campaign needs — the three below are just the opening hand we’ve already built.

No. 1🅆

The Daily Word

A Wordle-style daily word game where every answer is a message the client wants remembered — with a “why it matters” reveal and a call to action.

No. 2

The Daily Grouping

A Connections-style sorting puzzle built from the client’s own vocabulary — products, values, planks — easy to hard, shareable result grid.

No. 3

The Custom Card Game

Fully bespoke game design (Terry’s lane): original mechanics, original art, the client’s story as a deck. Nothing off-the-shelf competes here.

No. ∞

The Content Desk

We curate daily content against the client’s marketing calendar and every game they run updates in lockstep. Email capture, share loops, and a stats dashboard included — trivia, timelines, and whatever a client’s audience needs next ride the same feed.

The actual moat

Proof, not promises

We already built the whole thing. Twice.

The political demo is a complete, working install: faux campaign site, three daily games rotating from one curated data file, email capture, and a staff dashboard. The brand demo is where the card game began. And the parlor holds eight classics with character AI — Michael’s engine room, now a brandable format of its own. All of it lives on this domain. Deal yourself a hand:

Unlisted demos · real likenesses, spec work only — handle with care · the dashboard is the sales close

Market evidence

We did the research. It groups neatly.

Deep-research run, June 2026 — 22 sources fetched, 25 key claims adversarially verified. Full citations live in the repo (BUSINESS.md). Solved board:

It’s a real, paying market

Amuse Labs PuzzleMe: $99–$500+/mo tiers
Arkadium: 300+ partner companies
MarketJS sells custom Wordle clones
Email capture is a paid feature

Daily games retain audiences

NYT: news+games subscribers retain best
Games page → top-5 page on publisher sites*
10+ minute average sessions*
Netflix, Duolingo, Shopify bought campaigns*

Nobody sells this to campaigns

Reach / Impactive = volunteer tools only
Gamification bundled at $0 license
Voter-facing daily games: unoccupied
Our demo is the first of its kind

…But the money is brands

Campaigns pay in cents per action
Campaigns end every November
Brand deals are bespoke & quote-based
Politics = our showcase, not our base

Solved with one mistake: we first guessed campaigns were the customer. They’re the demo — and the open, headline-grabbing lane we lead with.
* vendor-reported numbers, and several brand deals ran as ad placements on publisher sites — direction corroborated, magnitudes unaudited.

The wedge

Incumbents sell software.
We’d sell the daily habit, managed.

Content-ops as a service

PuzzleMe hands clients an editor and walks away. Nobody bundles daily, message-calendar-aligned content curation. Our one-spreadsheet → every-game pipeline already does it.

Bespoke game design

Below five-figure custom quotes, there is no off-the-shelf equivalent of an original card game with original art and mechanics. That’s a defensible craft, not a template.

Data sovereignty

We deploy into the client’s own domain— signups land in their CRM, and we never hold their list. For campaigns, whose supporter file is the crown jewel, hosted platforms can’t say that. We suspect none of them do — verify before we say it in a sales room.

High-touch, not self-serve

The enterprise end of this market is already quote-based. A three-person shop selling retainers beats a three-person shop selling $99/mo subscriptions against entrenched platforms.

Eyes open

What we’d still need to answer.

TO: Terry, Walter · FROM: Michael · RE: Do we do this?

This is no longer a placeholder page — the site around it is the company as it would look on day one. The demos live on this domain now, the format library is framed the way we’d actually sell it (matched to the audience, not capped at three), and the data-sovereignty pitch is on the homepage because it falls out of how we already build.

What I want from you two: play the demos, read the board above, and tell me if you’d put your names on it. If yes, the next steps are cheap — an IP consult, a pricing one-pager, and one real prospect conversation each.

— Michael

I’m in — let’s scope itI have questions first